Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Moral Legitimacy: A Dworkinian Rights-Based Defense

Authors

Prisilia Kornelia MoonikFollow

Abstract

This study discusses the moral legitimacy of constitutional adjudication in general, with a particular focus on the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Moral legitimacy is crucial as it justifies the necessity of Constitutional Court—not merely because of its existence is stipulated by the 1945 Constitution. This issue is also discussed in response to the legislature’s (the People’s Representative Council) adverse reactions to the Constitutional Court, including efforts to weaken its authority. Additionally, moral legitimacy is also related to the well-known critique of constitutional adjudication: the counter-majoritarian difficulty. This study draws on Ronald Dworkin Rights-Based Theory, which defends constitutional adjudication as a means of safeguarding individual rights. Accordingly, the moral legitimacy of the Constitutional Court is framed as Dworkinian Rights-Based Judicial Review. From this perspective, constitutional adjudication serves as a shield for minorities against the dangers of majoritarian democracy and the tyranny of the majority. The Constitutional Court is therefore indispensable, as it upholds individual rights against legislative power, based on the principle of equal concern and respect.

Recommended Citation

Moonik, Prisilia Kornelia (2025) "Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Moral Legitimacy: A Dworkinian Rights-Based Defense," Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law): Vol. 12: No. 1, Article 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v12n1.a3
Available at: https://journal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/vol12/iss1/3

References

Books

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People I: Foundations. Cambridge-Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1993.

Applbaum, Arthur Isak. Legitimacy: The Right to Rule in a Wanton World. Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2019.

Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.

Butt, Simon. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill, 2015.

Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge-Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986.

_____. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

_____. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000.

_____. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000.

_____. Justice in Robes. Cambridge-Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006.

_____. Is Democracy Possible Here? New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006.

_____. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge-Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2011.

_____. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.

Fallon, Jr., Richard H. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2001.

_____. Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court. Cambridge-Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2018.

Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Hendrianto, Stefanus. Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts: Indonesia and the Search for Judicial Heroes. New York: Routledge, 2018.

Lafont, Christina. “Philosophical Foundations of Judicial Review.” in Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, eds. David Dyzenhaus and Malcolm Thorburn, 265-282. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.

Lord Lloyd of Hampstead and M.D.A. Freeman. Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence. London: ELBS, 1985.

Marmor, Andrei. Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.

McCoubrey, Hilaire, and Nigel D. White. Textbook on Jurisprudence. London: Blackstone Press Ltd, 1996.

McLeod, Ian. Legal Theory. London: Palgrave, 2012.

Ratnapala, Suri. Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Sajo, Andras, and Renata Uitz. The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

Schyff, Gerhard van der. Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and South Africa. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.

Simanjuntak, Marsillam. Pandangan Negara Integralistik: Sumber, Unsur dan Riwayatnya dalam Persiapan UUD 1945. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 1997.

Tim Penyusun. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses dan Hasil Pembahasan, Buku VI Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.

Other Documents

Adams, Maurice, and Gerhard van der Schyff. “Constitutional Review by the Judiciary in the Netherlands: A Matter of Politics, Democracy or Compensating Strategy?” Heidelberg Journal of International Law 66 (2006): 399-413.

Barak, Aharon. “The Supreme Court 2001 Term: Foreword: A Judge on Judging: The Role of a Supreme Court in a Democracy.” Harvard Law Review 116, no. 1 (2002): 16-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342624.

Barnett, Randy E. “Getting Normative: The Role of Natural Rights in Constitutional Adjudication.” Constitutional Commentary 12, no. 1 (1995): 93-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0008.

_____. “Constitutional Legitimacy.” Columbia Law Review 103, no. 1 (2003): 111-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123704.

Bassok, Or. “The Two Countermajoritarian Difficulties.” Saint Louis University Public Law Review 31, no. 2 (2012): 333-382.

Baxi, Upendra. “”A Known but an Indifferent Judge”: Situating Ronald Dworkin in Contemporary Indian Jurisprudence.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1, no. 4 (2003): 557-589. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.4.557.

Calabresi, Steven G. “The Tradition of the Written Constitution: Text, Precedent and Burke.” Alabama Law Review 57, no. 3 (2006): 635-687. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.700175.

Cox, Archibald. “The Role of the Supreme Court: Judicial Activism or Seff-Restraint?” Maryland Law Review 47, no. 1 (1987): 118-138.

Dworkin, Ronald. “The Forum of Principle.” New York University Law Review 56, no. 3 (1981): 469-518.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “The Role of the Constitutional Court in Securing Constitutional Government in Indonesia.” PhD Thesis, the University of Queensland, 2016.

Fallon, Jr., Richard H. “Legitimacy and the Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 118, no. 6 (2005): 1787-1853.

George, Robert P. “Natural Law, the Constitution and the Theory and Practice of Judicial Review.” Fordham Law Review 69, no. 6 (2001): 2269-2283.

Gerber, Scott D. “The Court, the Constitution and the History of Ideas.” Vanderbilt Law Review 61, no. 4 (2008): 1067-1126.

Harel, Alon, and Adam Shinar. “Two Concepts of Constitutional Legitimacy.” Global Constitutionalism 12, no. 1 (2002): 80-105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381722000156.

Kahana, Tsvi. “The Partnership Model of the Canadian Notwithstanding Mechanism: Failure and Hope.” SJD Thesis, University of Toronto, 2000.

Kurnia, Titon Slamet. “’Peradilan Konstitusional’ oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui Mekanisme Pengujian Konkret.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 68-73. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1614.

_____. “Mahkamah Agung dan Supremasi Konstitusi: Diskresi Yudisial dalam Penerapan Undang-Undang.” Mimbar Hukum 34, no. 1 (2022): 95-104. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i1.2084.

_____. “Recall Aswanto: Tertutupnya Ruang Disagreement antara Pembentuk Undang-Undang dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2023): 145-162. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2023.v7.i2.p143%20-%20162%20.

Landau, David, and Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” UC Davis Law Review 53, no. 3 (2020): 1313-1387.

Langford, Malcolm. “Why Judicial Review?” Oslo Law Review 1, no. 1 (2015): 36-85. https://doi.org/10.5617/oslaw2351.

Limbach, Jutta. “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution.” Modern Law Review 64, no. 1 (2001): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00306.

Moore, Michael S. “Justifying the Natural Law Theory of Constitutional Interpretation.” Fordham Law Review 69, no. 5 (2001): 2087-2117.

Rubin, Edward. “Judicial Review and the Right to Resist.” Georgetown Law Journal 97, no. 1 (2008): 61-118.

Scheppele, Kim Lane. “Autocratic Legalism.” University of Chicago Law Review 85, no. 2 (2018): 545-584.

Schyff, Gerhard van der. “The Prohibition of Constitutional Review by the Judiciary in the Netherlands in Critical Perspective: The Case and Roadmap for Reform.” German Law Journal 21, no. 5 (2020): 884-903. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.45.

Siregar, Fritz E. “Indonesian Constitutional Politics: 2003-2013.” SJD thesis, University of New South Wales, 2016.

Tremblay, Luc B. “General Legitimacy of Judicial Review and the Fundamental Basis of Constitutional Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23, no. 4 (2003): 525-562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.4.525.

_____. “The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3, no. 4 (2005): 617-648. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moi042.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v12n1.a3