Ungerminated Seed: Proportionality Test in the Indonesian Constitutional Court

Authors

Eko Riyadi, Lecturer at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia and Doctoral Student at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Jl. Kaliurang KM. 14, 5, Sleman, YogyakartaFollow
Satya Arinanto, Lecturer at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Jalan Prof. Mr. Djokosoetono, Pondok Cina, Beji, DepokFollow
Simon Butt, Lecturer at The University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaFollow
Fitra Arsil, Lecturer at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Jalan Prof. Mr. Djokosoetono, Pondok Cina, Beji, Depok

Abstract

This article examines how the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (the Court) constructs its argumentation regarding the limitation and derogation of human rights. The primary issue is how the Court interprets and operationalises the limitation clause under the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia to derogate from and limit human rights. This article also illustrates how the Court applies the derogation and limitation clauses to freedom of religion, the right against retroactive prosecution and the death penalty, the right of women to stand for election, and the right to freedom of expression. The Court has never ruled on a case of derogation of human rights; however, it has applied a limitation clause to derogate from non-derogable rights. It appears that the Court is ``trapped in confusion'' in applying limitation and derogation clauses to human rights. This study finds that the Court conflates limitation and derogation of human rights; the Court uses the limitation clause to derogate from rights classified as non-derogable; and the Court has yet to apply proportionality testing in implementing the limitation and derogation clauses on human rights.

Recommended Citation

Riyadi, Eko; Arinanto, Satya; Butt, Simon; and Arsil, Fitra (2025) "Ungerminated Seed: Proportionality Test in the Indonesian Constitutional Court," Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law): Vol. 12: No. 2, Article 2.
Available at: https://journal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/vol12/iss2/2

References

A. de Guttry, M. Gestri, and G. Venturini, eds. International Disaster Response Law. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2012.

Barak, Aharon. Proportionality, Constitutional Rights and Their Limitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Beilefeldt, Heiner. “The Contribution of Freedom of Religion or Belief to Societal Peace.” In HAM & Syari’at, Sebuah Kajian, Shari’a and Human Rights, A Course Book, edited by Cekli S. Pratiwi, Lena Larsen, Brett G. Scharffs, and Tore Lindolm. Bandung: Mizan, 2021.

Butt, Simon. “Between Control and Appeasement: Religion in Five Constitutional Court Decisions.” In Religion, Law and Intolerance in Indonesia, edited by Tim Lindsey and Helen Pausacker. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

Bomhoff, Jacco. Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origin and Meaning of Postwar Legal Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Eko Riyadi, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia: Perspektif Internasional, Regional Dan Nasional. Rajawali Press, 2018.

Finnis, Jhon. Natural Law & Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Hendrianto, Stephanus. “Against the Currents: The Indonesian Constitutional Court in an Age of Proportionality.” In Proportionality in Asia, edited by Po Jen Yap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Jakson, Vicki C, and Mark Tushnet, eds. Proportionality, New Frontiers, New Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Kommers, Donald P, and Russel A Miller. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2012.

Legg, Andrew. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat, Proportionality and Constitutional Culture. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Nihal Jayawickrama, The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Nowak, Manfred. Introduction to the International Human Rights Regime. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2003.

———. U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary. Kehl-Germany, Strassbourg-France, Arlington-USA: N.P. Engel Publisher, 2005.

Partsch, Karl Josef. “Freedom of Conscience and Expression, and Political Freedoms.” In The International Bill of Rights: The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights , edited by Louis Henkin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981.

Petersen, Niels. Proportionality and Judicial Activism. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Riyadi, Eko. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia: Perspektif Internasional, Regional Dan Nasional. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2018.

Riyadi, Eko, and Despan Heryansyah. “Antara Thin and Thick Rule of Law: Membaca Putusan Berdimensi Hak Asasi Manusia.” In Memotret Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Dari Berbagai Perspektif, edited by Festy Rahma Hidayati. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2024.

Schauer, Frederick. “Freedom of Expression Adjudication in Europe and the United State: A Case Study in Comparative Constitutional Architecture.” In European and US Constitutionalism, edited by Georg Nolte. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Sweet, Alec Stone, and Helen Keller. “Introduction: The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Order.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Thorburn, Malcolm. “Proportionality.” In Philosophical Foundation of Constitutional Law , edited by David Dyzenhaus and Malcolm Thorburn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Tulkens, Françoise. “Human Rights as the Good and Bad Conscience of Penal Law.” In Resisting Punitiveness in Europe? Welfare, Human Rights and Democracy, edited by S Snacken and E Dumortier. London: Routledge, 2011.

Journals

Abdi Jibril Ali, “Distinguishing Limitation on Constitutional Rights From Their Suspension: A Comment on the CUD Case,” Haramaya Law Review 1, no. 2 (2012):

Alexy, Robert. “Constitutional Rights and Proportionality.” Revus, no. 22 (June 20, 2014): 5165. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.2783.

Anbar Jayadi, “What Constitutes as Limitation of (Human) Rights in Indonesian Legal Context?,” Hasanuddin Law Review 3, no. 3 (2018): 290, https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i3.1203.

———. “Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality.” Ratio Juris 16, no. 2 (June 4, 2003): 131–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00228.

Bielefeldt, Heiner. “Misperceptions of Freedom of Religion or Belief.” Human Rights Quarterly 35, no. 1 (February 2013): 33–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0009.

Borowski, Martin. “Absolute Rights and Proportionality.” German Yearbook of International Law 56 (2013).

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe. “The Formal and the Substantive Meanings of Proportionality in the Supreme Court’s Decision Regarding the Security Fence.” Israel Law Review 38, no. 1–2 (July 4, 2005): 262–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002122370001270X.

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe, and Iddo Porat. “American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 8, no. 2 (2010).

———. “Proportionality and Justification.” University of Toronto Law Journal 64, no. 3 (July 2014): 458–77. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.020614RA.

———. “Proportionality and the Culture of Justification.” American Journal of Comparative Law 59, no. 2 (April 1, 2011): 463–90. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2010.0018.

Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Laurence R. Helfer, and Christoper J. Fariss, “Emergency and Escape: Explaining Derogation from Human Rights Treaties,” International Organization 65. (Fall 2011).

Finnis, John. “Absolute Rights: Some Problems Illustrated.” The American Journal of Jurisprudence 61, no. 2 (December 9, 2016): 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auw015.

Giri Ahmad Taufik, “Proportionality Test in the 1945 Constitution: Limiting Hizbut Tahrir Freedom of Assembly,” Constitutional Review 4, no. 1 (2018): 45, https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev413.

Hartman J.F., “Derogation from Human Rights Treaties in Public Emergencies-A Critique of Implementation by the European Commission and Court of Human Rights and the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations,” Harvard International Law Journal 22, 1 (1981): https://doi.org/10.23880/ijfsc-16000244.

Jodoin, Sébastien, and Yolanda Saito. “Crimes against Future Generations: Harnessing the Potential of Individual Criminal Accountability for Global Sustainability.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942145.

Liwanga, Roger-Claudia. “The Meaning Of ‘Gross Violation’ of Human Rights: A Focus on International Tribunals’ Decisions Over the DRC Conflicts.” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 44, no. 1 (2015).

McGregor, Marié. “ ‘Disadvantage’ and Affirmative Action.” South African Mercantile Law Journal 14, no. 4 (2002).

Osgar S. Matompo, “Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Keadaan Darurat,” Media Hukum 21, no. 1 (2011).

Petersen, Niels. “Alexy and the ‘German’ Model of Proportionality: Why the Theory of Constitutional Rights Does Not Provide a Representative Reconstruction of the Proportionality Test.” German Law Journal 21, no. 2 (February 10, 2020): 163–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.9.

Pinto, Mattia. “Awakening the Leviathan through Human Rights Law – How Human Rights Bodies Trigger the Application of Criminal Law.” Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 34, no. 2 (November 22, 2018): 161–84. https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.462.

Shilton, Adam, and Mila Versteg. “Do Constitutional Rights Make a Difference?” American Journal of Political Science 60, no. 3 (July 2016).

Spann, Girardeau A. “Affirmative Action and Discrimination.” Howard Law Journal 39, no. 1 (1995).

———. “Political Affirmative Action.” Georgetown Law Journal 112, no. 4 (2024).

Tulkens, Françoise. “The Paradoxical Relationship between Criminal Law and Human Rights.” Journal of International Criminal Crimes 7, no. 3 (July 2011).

Valentini, Vico. “Continental Criminal Law and European Human Rights Law: A Complicated Relationship.” University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper 13–09 (n.d.).

Varennes, Fernand de. “Language and Freedom of Expression in International Law.” Human Rights Quarterly 16, no. 1 (February 1994).

Vasandani, Malika Rajan, Dwi Putra Nugraha, and Susi Susantijo. “Affirmative Action Study on Political Rights of Women in the Constitution,” Constitutional Review (Consrev) 8, no. 1 (2022).

Zabel, Joseph. “Affirmative Action, Reaction, And Inaction: A Positive Political Theory Analysis Of Affirmative Action In Higher Education.” Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 19, no. 1 (2019).

Statutes

1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (2002).

American Convention on Human Rights (n.d.).

European Convention of Human Rights (n.d.).

Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 Year 2002 (n.d.).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Indonesian Criminal Code) (n.d.).

Law Number 10 Year 2008 on General Election of Members of the House of Representatives, the Regional Representative Council, and the Regional People’s Representative Council (n.d.).

Law Number 11 Year 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (n.d.).

Law Number 22 Year 1997 on Narcotics (n.d.).

Law Number 30 Year 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission (n.d.).

Law Number 39 Year 1999 on Human Rights (n.d.).

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (n.d.).

“Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1985/4, Annex (1985), n.d.

UDHR (1948).

“Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action.” U.N. Doe. A/CONF. 157/23, n.d.

Court Verdicts

Abdurrahman Wahid and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 140/PUU-VII/2009, n.d.

Abilio Jose Osorio Soares v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 065/PUU-II/2004, n.d.

Anggara and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 5/PUU-XVIII/2010, n.d.

Arnoldus Belau and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 81/PUU-XVIII/2020, n.d.

Asep Saifudin and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 56/PUU-XV/2017, n.d.

Eurico Guteres v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 018/PUU-V/2007, n.d.

Handyside v. United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 5493/72, December 7, 1976

Haris Azhar and Fatiah Maulidianty v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 78/PUU-XXI/2023, n.d.

Komisi Pemeriksa Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 006/PUU-I/2003, n.d.

Masykur Abdul Kadir v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 013/PUU-I/2003, n.d.

Muhammad Sholeh and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 22-24/PUU-VI/2008, n.d.

Mulyana Wirakusumah and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006, n.d.

Myuran Sukumaran and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, n.d.

Narliswandi Piliang Alias Iwan Piliang v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 50/PUU-VI/2008, n.d.

Nggay Mehang Tana and Others v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016, n.d.

Raymond Kamil and Indra Syahputra v. Indonesian Government, Constitutional Court, Verdict Number 146/PUU-XII/2024, n.d.

Other Documents

“Working Paper to U.N. Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities.” Decision 1992/109, 14, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1993/10 (June 8, 1993), n.d.