Implementation of the Administrative Dispute Resolution System for Citizens' Legal Protection in Indonesia After the Enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration

Authors

• Ayi Solehudin, Postgraduate student in Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University, Jalan Banda No. 42, Bandung, and Judge of the Serang Administrative Court, Jalan Syech Nawawi Al-Bantani No. 3 KM 5, Serang. S.H. (SGD State Islamic University), M.H. (Padjadjaran University), Dr. (Padjadjaran University)Follow
• Zainal Muttaqin, Lecturer and researcher in the Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung–Sumedang Km. 21. S.H. (Universitas Padjadjaran), M.H. (Universitas Padjadjaran), Dr. (Universitas Padjadjaran)
• Dewi Kania Sugiharti, Lecturer and researcher in the Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung–Sumedang Km. 21. S.H. (Universitas Padjadjaran), M.H. (Universitas Padjadjaran), Dr. (Universitas Padjadjaran)

Abstract

The integrated administrative dispute resolution system in Indonesia positions Administrative Proceedings as the primum remedium and the State Administrative Court as the ultimum remedium. This system is intended to provide comprehensive legal protection for citizens. However, in practice, it can lead to prolonged and ineffective dispute resolution processes, thereby limiting citizens' access to defend their rights before the the Administrative Court. This study analyses an effective integrated state administrative dispute resolution system that ensures legal protection for citizens. The legal issues addressed include the regulation of Administrative Proceedings within the integrated state administrative dispute resolution system following the enactment of the State Administrative Law and the implementation of this integrated system to provide legal protection for citizens. To address these issues, a normative legal research method was employed to present an overview of the arrangement for Administrative Proceedings and the implementation of an integrated administrative dispute resolution system that serves as a tool for legal protection for citizens. This study seeks to formulate a regulatory framework for Administrative Proceedings and implement an integrated state administrative dispute resolution system that is relevant and oriented toward supporting legal protection. In particular, it emphasises the importance of guaranteeing accessibility and procedural simplicity for citizens seeking to defend their rights.

Recommended Citation

Solehudin, Ayi; Muttaqin, Zainal; and Sugiharti, Dewi Kania (2026) "Implementation of the Administrative Dispute Resolution System for Citizens' Legal Protection in Indonesia After the Enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration," Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law): Vol. 13: No. 1, Article 2.
Available at: https://journal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/vol13/iss1/2

References

1. Alder, Jhon. General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law Fourth Edition. PalgraveMacmillan, 2002.
2. Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik (Political Science Fundamentals). PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2004.
3. Dani, Umar. Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Acara PTUN Menggali Teori-teori dan Prinsip-prinsip Pengadilan sebagai Akses Penyelesaian Sengketa yang Efektif. FH UII Press, 2019.
4. Efendi, A'an, and Freddy Poernomo. Hukum Administrasi. Sinar Grafika, 2017.
5. Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris dan Normatif (Dualism of Empirical and Normative Legal Research). Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
6. Fuadi, Munir. Teori Negara Hukum Modern (Rechtstaat) (Modern Law State Theory (Rechtstaat)). Refika Aditama, 2009.
7. Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Administrasi. PT. Bina Ilmu, 1987.
8. HS, Salim, and Erlies Septiana Nurbani. Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi (Application of Legal Theory in Thesis and Dissertation Research). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.
9. Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Buku II Beracara di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Proceeding to Understand the Law on State Administrative Courts, Book II Proceedings at the State Administrative Court), (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2003).
10. Marbun, S. F. Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia. UII Press, 2015.
11. Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Legal Research Methods). Mandar Maju, 2008.
12. Ridwan. Urgensi Upaya Administratif di Indonesia (The Urgency of Administrative Proceeding in Indonesia). FH UII PRESS, 2019.
13. Setiadi, Wicipto. Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Suatu Perbandingan (State Administrative Court Procedure Law a Comparison). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1995.
14. Irianto, Sulistiyowati et al. (Ed.), Kajian Sosio-Legal (Socio-Legal Studies), (Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan in collaboration with Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Leiden, and Universitas Groningen, 2012).
15. Supandi. Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Alumni, 2016.
16. Wahjono, Padmo. Indonesia Negara Berdasarkan atas Hukum (Indonesia, a Country Based on Law). Ghalia Indonesia, 1986.
17. Wijono, R. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (State Administrative Court Procedure Law). Sinar Grafika, 2008. Other Documents

18. Aji, Tito Bramantyo. ``The Indonesian Government's Participation in International Investment Law and its Reform Indonesian.'' Journal of International Law 19, no. 1 (2021): 83–112. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol19.1.4.
19. Barabash, T. M., I. O. Humeniuk, L. V. Levytska, and O. V. Muza. ``Innovative Approaches To Judicial Modeling in the Context of E-Democracy: Prospects for Ukraine.'' Science and Innovation 18, no. 4 (2022): 120–130. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.04.120.
20. Chandra, Teddy. ``Non-Litigation Process Land Dispute Settlement for Legal Certainty.'' Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 2, no. 2 (2019): 177–194. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.49.
21. Elpah, Dani. Philosophical, Juridical and Historical Overview of State Administration Dispute Resolution Including State Civil Apparatus Disputes Post Administrative Proceeding. State Administrative Dispute Resolution Training Materials After Administrative Proceeding and State Civil Apparatus Disputes for Administrative Court Judges, 2019.
22. Hasanah, Sitti Uswatul, Yanis Rinaldi, and Efendi. ``Dualism of Legal Basis for Administrative Dispute Resolution at The State Administrative Court.'' International Journal of Law 9, no. 3 (2023): 86–89.
23. Hendrawan, Daniel. ``Arbitration and Justice Denial on Foreign Direct Investment.'' Indonesian Journal of International Law 13, no. 6 (2016): 434–447. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol13.3.659.
24. Khoiriyyah, Nizar Naufal. ``Studi Analisis Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.'' Jurnal Syntax Admiration 3, no. 6 (2022): 776–778. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v3i6.443.
25. Sulistiani, Lies and Efa Laela Fakhriah. ``The Effect of Extra Judicial Settlement in Criminal Cases Based on the Principle of Ultimum Remedium.'' Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal Of Law) 10, no. 3 (2023): 300–320. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n3.a1.
26. Martana, Nyoman, Putu Ade Hariestha Martana, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, and Bagus Hermanto. ``Discourses of Legal Certainty in Execution of Administrative Court Decision.'' Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 2, no. 2 (2019): 89–117. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.35.
27. Nadir. ``The Paradigm of the General Principles of Good Governance as Examination Method of Indonesian Presidential Impeachment based on the Perspective of Ethical Control.'' Padjadjaran Journal Of Law 7, no. 2 (2020): 141–157. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n2.a1.
28. Panjaitan, Bernat. ``Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara (TUN) pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN).'' Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 3, no. 2 (2015): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v3i2.361.
29. Safitri, Erna D., and Nabitatus Sa'adah. ``Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.'' Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45.
30. Sopandi Keynote Speech at The Technical Guidance Event for State Administrative High Court Chairs and State Administrative Court Chairs Throughout Indonesia, in Bandung, 3–5 November 2021.
31. Sugiarto, Hari, and Bagus Oktafian Abrianto. ``Upaya Administratif sebagai Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.'' Jurnal Arena Hukum 11, no. 1 (2018): 24–47. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.2.
32. Supandi. ``Modernization of the State Administrative Jurisdiction in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 To Enhance the Progress of Indonesian Legal Civilization.'' Jurnal Hukum Peratun 2, no. 2 (2019): 124–148. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.222019.124-148. Legal Documents

33. Law Number 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power [Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman].
34. Law Number 5 of 1986 on Administrative Law [Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara].
35. Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration [Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan].
36. Law Number 5 of 2014 on State Civil Apparatus [Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara].
37. Law Number 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development in the Public Interest [Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum].
38. Law Number 7 of 2017 on General Elections [Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum].
39. Law Number 1 of 2015 on Regional Head Election [Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Wali Kota menjadi Undang-Undang].
40. Supreme Court Regulation Number 6 of 2018 on State Administrative Disputes Resolution has been issued after undergoing administrative proceedings [Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan setelah Menempuh Upaya Administratif].
41. Supreme Court Circular Number 2 of 1991 on Instructions for the Implementation of Several Provisions in Law Number 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Courts [Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 1991 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Beberapa Ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara].
42. Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 10 of 2020 on the implementation of the formulation of the results of the plenary meeting of the Supreme Court chamber [Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas bagi Pengadilan].