Abstract
At first glance, indigenous people and international trade appear to be two separate issues. However, this perception does not apply in the case of European Regulation 2023/1115. This study aims to provide an understanding of how Indonesia should respond to the EU DFR, which has affected Indonesia’s national interests in protecting indigenous people. This study applied a normative method through doctrinal and conceptual approaches to achieve the objective. The study covers two main discussions. The first explains how due diligence under the EU DFR has indirectly pushed Indonesia to become an EU trading partner and provide more excellent protection for local indigenous people to gain access to the Union’s market for its agricultural products. The second discussion explains how Indonesia should respond to this regulation by considering protecting its indigenous people and ensuring the availability of market access for Indonesian companies and traders. The first discussion states that the EU DFR will prohibit the export and import of agricultural products if the trading partner’s company does not provide adequate legal protection for its indigenous people. The second discussion suggests that Indonesia must better protect its indigenous people to secure market access to the European Union. However, if the EU regulator acts arbitrarily, Indonesia reserves the right to address these issues through the available means of trade dispute settlement under international law.
Recommended Citation
Tehupeiory, Aartje and Simbolon, Putu George Matthew
(2024)
"Extraterritorial Act versus the Indigenous People Protection: An Analysis of the European Union Deforestation-Free Regulation,"
Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law): Vol. 11:
No.
3, Article 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v11n3.a5
Available at:
https://journal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/vol11/iss3/2
References
References
Books
Akbari, Suhailah. “The Relationship between Freedom of Transit and General and Security Exceptions under WTO Rules.” In The WTO Transit Regime for Landlocked Countries and its Impacts on Members’ Regional Transit Agreements: The Case of Afghanistan’s Transit Trade with Pakistan, edited by Suhailah Akbari, 167–201. European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
Argent, Pierre d’. International Law Textbook: Setting the International Stage. Louvain: UC Louvain & edX, 2021.
Asselt, Harro van. “C43Trade.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, edited by Lavanya Rajamani and Jacqueline Peel, 0. Oxford University Press, 2021.
Beshkardana, Padideh Ala’i, Katayoon. “The Limits of Transparency: China, the United States, and the World Trade Organization.” In Cultures of Transparency. Routledge, 2021.
Borrows, John, and Risa Schwartz. Indigenous Peoples and International Trade: Building Equitable and Inclusive International Trade and Investment Agreements. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Bossche, Peter Van den, and Werner Zdouc. The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fifth Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Bossche, Peter Van den, and Denise Prévost. Essentials of WTO Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, and Jorge E Vinuales. International Environmental Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Koul, Autar Krishen. Guide to the WTO and GATT Economics, Law and Politics. 6th Edition. New Delhi: Springer, 2018.
Maciel, Carolina, and Bettina Bock. “Animal Welfare Measures and the WTO Post-EC - Seal Products Case: A Renewed Debate and Research Agenda.” The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare: Theory, Evidence and Policy, CABI Books, January 2020.
Schmalenbach, Kirsten. “Article 26.” In Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, edited by Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach, 465–92. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55160-8_29.
Shelton, Dinah. International Environmental Law: 3rd Edition. BRILL, 2021.
Sood, Muhammad. Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.
Other Documents
Astomo, Putera, and Asrullah Asrullah. “Legal Protection for the Indigenous Law Communities and Their Traditional Rights based on the Verdict of the Constitutional Court.” PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) 6, no. 1 (April 29, 2019): 90–108.
Baroncini, Elisa, and Claire Brunel. “A WTO Safe Harbour for the Dolphins: The Second Compliance Proceedings in the US–Tuna II (Mexico) Case.” World Trade Review 19, no. 2 (April 2020): 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745620000038.
Berning, Laila, and Metodi Sotirov. “Hardening Corporate Accountability in Commodity Supply Chains under the European Union Deforestation Regulation.” Regulation & Governance n/a, no. n/a (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12540.
Berning, Laila, and Metodi Sotirov. “Hardening Corporate Accountability in Commodity Supply Chains under the European Union Deforestation Regulation.” Regulation & Governance n/a, no. n/a (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12540.
Blackstock, Cindy, Muriel Bamblett, and Carlina Black. “Indigenous Ontology, International Law and the Application of the Convention to the over-Representation of Indigenous Children in out of Home Care in Canada and Australia.” Child Abuse & Neglect, 30 Years of the Convention on the Rights of the Child: Evolving Progress and Prospects for Child Protection, 110 (December 1, 2020): 104587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104587.
Bunchy, M., and M. Hobley. “FLEGT and Livelihoods. | CABI Reviews.” CABI Reviews, May 29, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201813057.
Carpenter, Kristen, and Alexey Tsykarev. “Indigenous Peoples and Diplomacy on the World Stage” 115 (January 2021): 118–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2021.7.
Claeys, Priscilla, and Marc Edelman. “The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47, no. 1 (January 2, 2020): 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1672665.
Cooper, Andrew F. “The Disintermediation Dilemma and Its Impact on Diplomacy: A Research Agenda for Turbulent Times.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 30, no. 4 (October 2, 2019): 799–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2019.1673556.
Cunduk Wasiati, Hartanto. “PERIZINAN SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PEMANFAATAN HUTAN MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT.” Jurnal Meta-Yuridis 3, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v3i1.5755.
Dewi, Yetty, and Mikaila Jessy Azzahra. “Re-Examining Indonesia’s Nickel Export Ban: Does It Violate the Prohibition to Quantitative Restriction?” Padjadjaran Journal of International Law 6, no. 2 (August 4, 2022): 180–200. https://doi.org/10.23920/pjil.v6i2.797.
Etchart, Linda. “Indigenous Peoples and International Law in the Ecuadorian Amazon.” Laws 11, no. 4 (August 2022): 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040055.
“EU Paves Way for Landmark Deforestation-Free Products Regulation | News | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD.” Accessed July 10, 2023. https://sdg.iisd.org/news/eu-paves-way-for-landmark-deforestation-free-products-regulation/.
European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 (Text with EEA relevance), 150 OJ L § (2023). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1115/oj/eng.
Fatimah, Fatimah, and Febryansyah Nataly. “Strategi Komunikasi Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (Aman ) Dalam Memperjuangkan RUU Masyarakat Hukum Adat.” Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi (JIKOM) STIKOM IMA 14, no. 03 (November 22, 2022): 116–24. https://doi.org/10.38041/jikom1.v14i03.254.
Filer, Colin, Sango Mahanty, and Lesley Potter. “The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.” Land 9, no. 3 (March 2020): 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030067.
George, Dalton R., Todd Kuiken, and Jason A. Delborne. “Articulating ‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent’ (FPIC) for Engineered Gene Drives.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286, no. 1917 (December 18, 2019): 20191484. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1484.
Hailes, Oliver. “Lithium in International Law: Trade, Investment, and the Pursuit of Supply Chain Justice.” Journal of International Economic Law 25, no. 1 (March 1, 2022): 148–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgac002.
Harada, Kazuhiro, Muhammad Habib, Yumi Sakata, and Ahmad Maryudi. “The Role of NGOs in Recognition and Sustainable Maintenance of Customary Forests within Indigenous Communities: The Case of Kerinci, Indonesia.” Land Use Policy 113 (February 1, 2022): 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105865.
Hargita, Yvonne, Lukas Giessen, and Sven Günter. “Similarities and Differences between International REDD+ and Transnational Deforestation-Free Supply Chain Initiatives—A Review.” Sustainability 12, no. 3 (January 2020): 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030896.
Hasan, A. K. M. Raquibul, and Khadiza Nasrin. “Reforming the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of WTO: Challenges and Prospects.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY, December 30, 2021. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4175796.
Hendra, Rahmad, Rosa Agustina, and Ratih Lestarini. “The Effects of Conflict and Palm Oil Investment Between Investors and Communities in Indonesia.” International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science 4, no. 1 (January 31, 2023): 142–52. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i1.491.
Herningtyas, Wieke. “Conflict of Palm Oil Companies with Indigenous People and Forest Surrounding Society.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 7, no. 2 (December 12, 2021): 199–209. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v7i2.504.
Jamin, Mohamad, Sapto Hermawan, and Mulyanto Mulyanto. “A Discourse of the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Their Contributions to the Indonesian Development: Lessons Learned from New Zealand.” PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) 10, no. 3 (December 18, 2023): 346–66. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n3.a3.
Kemlu RI. “Kedutaan Besar Republik Indonesia di Brussel merangkap Luksemburg & Uni Eropa Belgia.” Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. Accessed July 24, 2023. https://kemlu.go.id/brussels/id.
Krisch, Nico. “Jurisdiction Unbound: (Extra)Territorial Regulation as Global Governance.” European Journal of International Law 33, no. 2 (May 1, 2022): 481–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chac028.
Kristiani, Verlia. “Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Bagi Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Kajian Dan Implementasi).” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 11, no. 1 (August 24, 2020): 144–62. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1449.
Laturette, Adonia Ivonne. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat Pada Kawasan Hutan.” SASI 27, no. 1 (April 13, 2021): 102–12. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.504.
Leo, Sandy, Jatna Supriatna, Kosuke Mizuno, and Chris Margules. “Indigenous Dayak Iban Customary Perspective on Sustainable Forest Management, West Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Biodiversitas 23 (2022): 424–35. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230144.
Leonelli, Giulia Claudia. “Anti-Deforestation Npr-PPMs and Carbon Border Measures: Thinking About the Chapeau of Article XX GATT in Times of Climate Crisis.” Journal of International Economic Law 26, no. 3 (September 1, 2023): 416–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad016.
———. “Environmental Unilateralism and the Chapeau of Article XX GATT: The ‘Line of Equilibrium’ and the Question of ‘Differently Situated’ Countries.” Journal of World Trade 57, no. 5 (October 1, 2023). https://kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=JournalsTRADTRAD2023030.pdf.
Mansoor, Sheikh Inam UI, and Menuu Chopra. “Article XX Of GATT: Territoriality Of Unilateral TradeMeasure And Sustainable Development.” Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online 19, no. 04 (2020): 7784–92.
Marin Duran, G. “Chapter XI.25: Exhaustible Natural Resources and Article XX(g) GATT.” In In: Delimatsis, P and Reins, L, (Eds.) Trade and Environmental Law. (Pp. 219-229). Edward Elgar Publishing (2021), edited by P. Delimatsis and L. Reins, XI:219–29. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/book/9781785369520/b-9781783476985-XI_25.xml.
Muhdar, Muh Zulkifli, and Jasmaniar Jasmaniar. “Hak Masyarakat Adat: Studi Perbandingan Deklarasi PBB Tentang Hak-Hak Masyarakat Adat Dan Pasal 18 B Ayat 2 UUD NRI Tahun 1945.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law 3, no. 2 (September 20, 2021): 119–34.
Oosterveer, P. J. M. “Sustainability of Palm Oil and Its Acceptance in the EU.” Journal of Oil Palm Research 32 (2020): 365–76. https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2020.0039.
Perram, Anouska, and Norman Jiwan. “Human Rights Violations Connected with Deforestation – Emerging and Diverging Approaches to Human Rights Due Diligence.” Business and Human Rights Journal 8, no. 1 (February 2023): 110–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2022.38.
Redaksi. “Pakar Hukum Agraria DR Aartje Tehupeiory: Negara Harus Hadir Guna Melindungi Hak Adat.” Poros Nusantara, November 19, 2021, sec. Nasional. https://porosnusantara.co.id/2021/11/pakar-hukum-agraria-dr-aartje-tehupeiory-negara-harus-hadir-guna-melindungi-hak-adat/.
Septya, and Fatma. “Kedudukan Dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Adat Dalam Mendiami Hutan Adat | Legislatif” 4, no. 1 (2020): 79–91.
Shrinkhal, Rashwet. “‘Indigenous Sovereignty’ and Right to Self-Determination in International Law: A Critical Appraisal.” AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 17, no. 1 (March 1, 2021): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180121994681.
Stelzer, Joana, Everton das Neves Goncalves, and Keite Wieira. “WTO Understanding on Certification Dolphin Safe in Tuna Fishing: The US Tuna II Case.” Veredas Do Direito 16 (2019): 245.
The European Commission. “A European Green Deal,” July 14, 2021. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
———. “COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Minimising the Risk of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Associated with Products Placed on the EU Market Accompanying the Document Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the Making Available on the Union Market as Well as Export from the Union of Certain Commodities and Products Associated with Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 - Publications Office of the EU,” November 19, 2021. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/43c4301d-4943-11ec-91ac-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
———. “Paris Agreement,” 2023. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/international-action-climate-change/climate-negotiations/paris-agreement_en.
The European Council. “Council Adopts New Rules to Cut Deforestation Worldwide,” May 16, 2023. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/05/16/council-adopts-new-rules-to-cut-deforestation-worldwide/.
“The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC.” Accessed July 8, 2023. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement.
Thuyne, Gauthier van, and Matthew Townsend. “EU Agrees on New Deforestation-Free Regulation.” Allen Overy, January 18, 2023. https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/news-and-insights/publications/eu-agrees-on-new-deforestation-free-regulation.
Trivedi, Jhanvi, Danijel Bajt, Yann Duval, and Jeong Ho Yoo. “Non-Tariff Measures in Regional Trade Agreements in Asia and the Pacific : SPS, TBT and Government Procurement,” 2019. https://repository.unescap.org/handle/20.500.12870/1314.
Urzedo, Danilo, Simone Pedrini, Clancy Hearps, Kingsley Dixon, and Stephen van Leeuwen. “Indigenous Environmental Justice through Coproduction of Mining Restoration Supply Chains in Australia.” Restoration Ecology 30, no. S1 (2022): e13748. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13748.
Van Damme, Isabelle. “EU Deforestation Regulation for Delivery in Jakarta.” In Focus Group Discussion on the European Union’s Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (EU CBAM): Presented Papers, 01:1–33. 01. Jakarta: International Research Center on WTO and Anti-Trust Laws, 2023.
Vij, Vinitika. “Changing Realities: Evolution and Extraterritoriality within Article XX(G) of GATT for Global Environmental Concerns.” Trade, Law and Development 14, no. 02 (2022): 195–238.
World Trade Organization. “GD/239 | GATT Disputes Database (WTO) - United States - Restrictions on Imports of Tuna.” World Trade Organization: GATT Disputes, 2023. https://gatt-disputes.wto.org/index.php/dispute/gd-239.
———. “WTO | Dispute Settlement - the Disputes - DS2 - United States — Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline,” 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds2_e.htm.
———. “WTO | Dispute Settlement - the Disputes - DS58 - United States — Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products,” 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds58_e.htm.
———. “WTO | Dispute Settlement - the Disputes - DS401 - European Communities — Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products,” 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds401_e.htm.
———. “WTO | Environment - Disputes 4 - Mexico Etc versus US: ‘Tuna-Dolphin.’” World Trade Organization, 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis04_e.htm.
———. “WTO | Legal Texts - Marrakesh Agreement - Agreement on Technical Barrier to Trade,” 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt_e.htm.
“WTO | Dispute Settlement - DS381: United States — Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products.” Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds381_e.htm.
“WTO | Dispute Settlement - the Disputes - DS2.” Accessed October 10, 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds2_e.htm.
Zhunusova, Eliza, Vianny Ahimbisibwe, Le Thi Hoa Sen, Azin Sadeghi, Tarin Toledo-Aceves, Gillian Kabwe, and Sven Günter. “Potential Impacts of the Proposed EU Regulation on Deforestation-Free Supply Chains on Smallholders, Indigenous Peoples, and Local Communities in Producer Countries Outside the EU.” Forest Policy and Economics 143 (October 1, 2022): 102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102817.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v11n3.a5