•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Law of Money Laundering has a fundamental point to eradicate transnational predicate and serious crimes. Each state has different arrangements to address predicate crime. Indonesia considers predicate crime in the category of ordinary crime consisting of fraud and embezzlement. However, ordinary or conventional crimes may only be subject to the Law under limited circumstances. Article 69 of the Law of Money Laundering remains debatable among criminal law experts due to the relation with Articles 77 and 78 of the Law. The last two articles prescribe that burden of proof on the case of predicate crimes is on defendant, not public prosecutor. Defendant must prove assets that are suspected as result of crime, not acquired from the crime, or related to crime. Currently, there is no elucidation to the articles. This study analyzed two legal issues. Firstly, does the formulation of Article 2, paragraph 1, and Article 69 of the Law of Anti-Money Laundering guarantee legal certainty and fulfil a sense of justice? Secondly, does the Article 2 paragraph 1 letter z of the Law cause ordinary criminal acts to be entangled with the Law on Money Laundering?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n1.a1

References

Books

Alvon Kurnia Palma, (et.al.), Implementasi dan Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment (Peningkatan Kekayaan Secara Tidak Sah) di Indonesia, Jakarta: Indonesian Corruption Watch, 2014.

Andi Hamzah, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1985.

___________, Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1983.

Bambang Poernomo, Pola Dasar Teori-Asas Umum Hukum Acara Pidana dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Menanggulangi Kejahatan, Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.

Edi Setiadi dan Rena Yulia, Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, Bandung: Graha Ilmu, 2010.

Jan Rammelink, Hukum Pidana, Komentar Atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.

M. Ali Zaidan, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Moeljatno, Asas Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1987.

Roeslan Saleh, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggung jawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Centra, 1968.

Romli Atmasasmita, Globalisasi & Kejahatan Bisnis, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2010.

________________, Analisis Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Bandung: Jurnal Hukum Padjadjaran, 2015.

Supanto, Kejahatan Ekonomi Global dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 2010.

Other Documents

AA. Oka Dharmawan, “Dampak Illegal Transction Bank Lewat ATM”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 29, No. 1, (2010).

Bainbridge, Jason, "Discovering the Law Again: John Grisham, Ed Stevens, and the Postmaterial Lawyer", Australian Journal of Communication 30, No. 2 (2003).

Butt, Simon, Melissa Crouch, and Rosalind Dixon, "The First Decade of Indonesia's Constitutional Court", Australian Journal of Asian Law 16, No. 2 (2016).

Collins, Paulion, “Costs of Cooperation Rather than Competition in the Provision of Justice?”, Australian Journal of Public Administration 64, No. 3, (2005).

Detik. “Irjen Djoko Susilo Protes Harta Perolehan dari 2003 Ikut Disita KPK”. Detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-2233958/irjen-djoko-susilo-protes-harta-perolehan-dari-2003-ikut-disita-kpk.

Detiknews. “Aset Sebelum Korupsi Harus Dikembalikan, Ini Harta Djoko Susilo Sitaan KPK”. Detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5563901/aset-sebelum-korupsi-harus-dikembalikan-ini-harta-djoko-susilo-sitaan-kpk.

Kompas. “Dana Operasional Polisi Terbatas”. Kompas.com. http://regional.kompas.com/read/2011/07/07/03442644/Dana.Operasional.Polisi.Terbatas.

Media Indonesia. “Mahkamah Agung Beberkan Alasan Dikabulkannya PK Djoko Susilo”. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/403873/ma-beberkan-alasan-dikabulkannya-pk-djoko-susilo.

Muchamad Ali Safa’at. “Kekuatan Mengikat dan Pelaksanaan Putusan MK”. Safaat Lecture UB. http://safaat.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/03/Kekuatan-Mengikat-dan-Pelaksanaan-Putusan-MK.pdf.

__________________. “Penafsiran Konstitusi”. Safaat Lecture UB. http://safaat.lecture.ub.ac.id/2011/11/penafsiran-konstitusi/.

Nyoman Sarikat Putera Jaya, “Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Internasional Khususnya Terorisme” (paper presented at Seminar Regional under the theme Perkembangan kejahatan Internasional dan Upaya Penanggulangannya, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Jakarta, 30 May 2012).

Ronny Oktahandika, "Pembuktian Kejahatan Asal (Predicate Crime) Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Pada Pelaku Pasif", JLR-Jurnal Legal Reasoning 1, No. 2 (2019).

Rustam DKA Harahap, "LGBT di Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Islam, HAM, Psikologi dan Pendekatan Maṣlaḥah", Al-Ahkam 26, No. 2 (2016).

Sluiter, Goran, "Implementation of the ICC Statute in the Dutch Legal Order Journal of International Criminal Justice 2, No. 1 (2004).

Syukri Asy'ari, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito, and Mohammad Mahrus Ali, “Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan tahun 2003-2012)”, Jurnal Konstitusi 10, No. 4 (November 2013).

Tempo. “Pembobolan ATM di Bali Lebih Dari Rp 4 Miliar”. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/220409/pembobolan-atm-di-bali-lebih-dari-rp-4-miliar.

The Jakarta Post. “Husband of Malinda Dee has First Trial Hearing”. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/09/20/husband-malinda-dee-has-first-trial-hearing.html.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n1.a1

Share

COinS