•  
  •  
 
Jurnal Wacana Politik

Abstract

This study examines the discrepancy between normative judgments regarding alleged abuse of power and voters’ electoral behavior in the context of the 2024 general election in Indonesia. Using survey data from urban voters in Jakarta, this study operationalizes democratic ambivalence as the tension between normative attitudes toward the candidacy of Gibran Rakabuming Raka (Gibran) and respondents’ voting behavior. The results of descriptive analysis, cross-tabulation, and multinomial logistic regression indicate that the discrepancy between normative evaluation and electoral preference is the norm for the respondents. The “conflicted accept” category (53.1% of respondents) is made up of those who accept the continuation of Gibran’s candidacy but opt for another pair of candidates. But perhaps more relevant to the question of electoral accountability is the finding in the “conflicted reject” category (28.4%), which includes respondents who reject Gibran continuing his candidacy but still express electoral support for the Prabowo-Gibran ticket. This pattern suggests that the normative opposition to a candidacy, produced by institutional controversy, does not necessarily lead to a loss of electoral support. Regression analysis indicates that these patterns are not significantly explained by age group, education, or income. These findings confirm that the relationship between normative attitudes and voting behavior is non-linear and reflects a separation between normative evaluation and voting behavior in contemporary democratic practice.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.