Abstract
Many accounts of Western political history suggest a direct, straight line from Ancient Greece to modern democracy. This article argues that this “Great Books” narrative is a myth that ignores how political ideas actually change over time. Using Reinhart Koselleck’s Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) framework, we demonstrate that key terms such as “law” and “citizenship” were not merely preserved but fundamentally transformed as they moved through Greco-Roman, Islamic, and Judeo-Christian civilizations. We call this transformation “conceptual alchemy”: a series of semantic translations through which Greek rationalism was retheorized via Islamic metaphysics and later synthesized by medieval scholasticism. Consequently, rather than a monolithic entity, the “West” must be understood as a discursive palimpsest shaped by cross-cultural collisions and translations. Understanding these hidden layers provides a more transparent methodological alternative to Eurocentric historiography and helps explain why modern democratic identity often feels so fragmented and contradictory today.
Recommended Citation
Seidi, Dembael and Firmansyah, Muhammad Andi
(2026)
"Rethinking the Canon: A Conceptual History of the Layered Foundations of Western Politics,"
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik): Vol. 11:
Iss.
2, Article 3.
Available at:
https://journal.unpad.ac.id/wacanapolitik/vol11/iss2/3
Included in
Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Philosophy Commons, Political Theory Commons
